Have you
ever decided to accept an invitation or been required to attend a meeting? Most likely, you have. There is a greater chance that you went to
one of these meetings with the attitude, “What
Am I Doing Here!” You have ignored
meeting with the individual or group in the past and had great reasons for
ignoring them. One day, you ended up
accepting the invite to meet and as the meeting grew closer, you started
looking for ways to avoid going.
Remember the
article “Even a Blind Squirrel Can Find Nuts?” This is the thought that has carried me
through these types of meetings and turned some of them into potentially useful
relationships. It is always hard to
determine what other people want or think without engaging them. Making conclusions on future endeavors with
zero data makes no sense. The best way
to approach these meetings is seeking a way to work together. You do not have to bend over backward to end
up with a positive relationship, but you certainly will not end up with one if
you never try. I believe it is OK to be
firm in your expectations and direct in your approach. The real goal is to explore how a
relationship can be turned into a Win-Win.
This effort really requires care and thought on both sides.
It is very
easy to use that gut feeling to make decisions.
If this is one of your main assets, it likely works well for you. However, I suggest you read the book “Thinking Fast and Slow”, by Daniel Kahneman.
The book describes two systems of thinking. One highlights the gut feel or
intuition approach for doing things. The
other utilizes a more analytic and thoughtful means of approaching problems. Interestingly, most people make gut decisions
regularly and end up well. The book shows
how this may not be the best way to approach problems and that carefully
thought approaches have better outcomes.
In the last
few months, I have made the purposeful decision to attend meetings that I wanted
to avoid. My days leading to the
meetings and the travel caused me to ask, “Why
am I going?” I had decided the
meetings were not worth the time and I would regret them. I almost canceled on a few of them. I went anyway and the results were very
different than my intuition had suggested, possibly because my discussions were
more direct and that I planned what I wanted from the discussions. It is still unclear whether the meetings will
end up in a Win-Win, but I now see paths to that outcome.
The point is
that while your time is limited, your startup needs all the thinking you can
provide. Acting on intuition is fine,
but there are those times you need to put more strategic thinking in
place. A saying we used during financings was “I am kissing a lot of frogs to find that prince or princess.” This is true in developing partnerships or
new business directions. Sometimes,
doing things you want to avoid may eliminate a possible benefit you had
previously ignored.
Next time
you think of meetings as something to avoid, think about what an ideal outcome
of the meeting would be. Do the required
planning to prepare for the meeting so you can direct the discussions along the
lines to achieve the benefits you wish to obtain. You will have an advantage because you can
just walk away if you feel results are less than satisfactory. The ability to walk away is a powerful
advantage in these situations. Next
time, rather than miss an opportunity, try extract the Win-Win to benefit for
your startup. Why not!
You
can follow Taffy Williams on Twitter by @twilli2861 and
you can email him with questions at twilli2861@aol.com
and his company website , photo website,
or like ColonialTDC on Facebook. You can also find him in the group
Startup
Group on Linkedin. Other articles can be found in the
Charlotte,
NC- small business section of Examiner.com. This blog is listed on
StartUpRoar and on Alltop®.

Being outcome focused is an essential skill, especially as an entrepreneur. Yet there are a lot of things I have learned and people I have met because I was open and curious to what might emerge.
ReplyDeleteNonetheless, at some point I recognized I needed to narrow my focus. I created 3 very simple strategic goals and now use those to test requests for my time against. If it doesn't seem relevant to one or more of my strategic objectives I have started to say no a lot more often.
On the other hand it took a lot of "frog kissing" to get clear about what my strategic goals should be to begin with. Even if I didn't know "why I was there" I more often than not came away with something of value. It has definitely not been a linear process, but then again, I am not a linear thinker.
You have me wondering what might be the indicators that it is time to either put the blinders on and start saying no more or take them off and be open to what might emerge? Personally, I continue to struggle to find that balance.